<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Transnational Online Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere</link>
	<description>This transnational Knowledge Debate serves as a way to articulate research requests from civil society organisations (CSOs) all over Europe and submit these requests to the collective  research capacity of all LK members and beyond. This tool has been initiated by members of a European consortium, Public Engagement with Research and Research Engagement with Society (PERARES). The consortium’s members represent universities, civil society organisations and science shops that carry out collaborative research with civil society organisations.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Budd Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Budd Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 19:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Fifth Draft-Comments accepted until May 17

5th Draft
Communiqué on Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy* 
This statement is the product of a global dialogue and discussion process hosted by the Living Knowledge Network’s PERARES project.  It  is  an initiative of the ‘Big Tent’ Group of international networks which includes: Asia Pacific University Community Engagement Network, Centro Boliviano de Estudios Multidisciplinarios, Commonwealth Universities Extension and Engagement Network, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, Global Alliance on Community Engaged Research, Global University Network for Innovation, Living Knowledge Network, PASCAL International Observatory, Participatory Research in Asia, and the Talloires Network with additional contributions from on site and on line participants at the 5th International Conference of the Living Knowledge Network. 
We begin by expressing our deep concerns about:
The continued destruction of our common home, the planet Earth,
Our over dependence on technological solutions and how this can lead to ‘green washing’, 
Ways that the dominant global economic system with its unitary focus on economic growth results in increased inequality, loss of jobs, alienation from both land and each other,
The persistent exclusion of the dreams of the bottom billion people of our world, and
Stressful and unhealthy lifestyles leading to physical and mental health problems;
We are witnesses to massive expressions of aspiration and deep change as seen in the Arab Spring and the Occupy movements.
We are aware and supportive of work being done in many global higher education and engagement spaces such as the Science in Society Programme of the European Commission.
We are also aware that universities are complicit in the creation of our planetary problems but  we  also believe that knowing that communities and higher education institutions working together can play a significant role in the attainment of sustainable development. 
 We respectfully contribute our ideas to spaces for engagement and action on issues of planetary survival, including, but not limited to the
United Nations Rio + 20 events
Higher Education Treaty Circle process
Horizon 2020 programme in Europe
We call for action to:
1. Challenge existing paradigms, structures and practices, by:
a) Recognizing that knowledge and expertise exists outside of the institutions of higher education.  Communities and the earth itself are intellectual spaces where knowledge is created. Decolonizing our minds and our institutions is one step to acting on this awareness,  
b) Acknowledging that ‘community’ or ‘civic’ engagement, has to mean more than just people.  Community includes the environment or the rest of nature,  
c) Promoting the concept of an ‘Ecoversity’ whereby higher education institutions themselves are transformed into integrated holistic communities and where research, teaching and action functions are no longer separate   
d) Breaking down the silos of knowledge creation and moving to co-creation of knowledge in the university and community,  
e) Being open to ideas such as appointing community scholars, creating smaller universities, ‘walking on the grass’, and
f) Working towards new disciplines for a new world.
2. Increase the accountability of higher education by:
a) Shifting accountability from authorities and funders to citizens, involving community at all levels of Higher Education governance,
b) Linking our academic work with environmental social movements and to related movements against poverty, towards a solidarity economy, 
c) Ensuring that people have an understanding of the interdependencies between environmental, social and economic forces and the skills and abilities to meet sustainability challenges, and
d) Moving beyond eco-branding by holding institutions accountable for the trademarks, brands and media around sustainability that they display.  
3. Understand the connections of our local practices within a global framework by:
a) Acknowledging that in this inter-connected world, all ecological disturbances in one eco-zone spread rapidly throughout the world,
b) Promoting new mechanisms of global governance and democratic accountability with multi-stakeholder perspectives, and
c) Supporting the development of higher education theories and practices that nurture our global commons in the interest of a global public good.
In closing
We live in turbulent times; our world is changing at accelerating speed. Information is everywhere, but wisdom appears in short supply when trying to address key inter-related challenges of our time such as; runaway climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the depletion of natural resources, the on-going homogenization of culture, and rising inequity. Universities have a responsibility to look after the well-being of the planet, not as stand-alone beacons of knowledge, but as places where wisdom of communities, eco-systems and the academy in partnerships for a world that is more sustainable and just.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifth Draft-Comments accepted until May 17</p>
<p>5th Draft<br />
Communiqué on Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy*<br />
This statement is the product of a global dialogue and discussion process hosted by the Living Knowledge Network’s PERARES project.  It  is  an initiative of the ‘Big Tent’ Group of international networks which includes: Asia Pacific University Community Engagement Network, Centro Boliviano de Estudios Multidisciplinarios, Commonwealth Universities Extension and Engagement Network, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, Global Alliance on Community Engaged Research, Global University Network for Innovation, Living Knowledge Network, PASCAL International Observatory, Participatory Research in Asia, and the Talloires Network with additional contributions from on site and on line participants at the 5th International Conference of the Living Knowledge Network.<br />
We begin by expressing our deep concerns about:<br />
The continued destruction of our common home, the planet Earth,<br />
Our over dependence on technological solutions and how this can lead to ‘green washing’,<br />
Ways that the dominant global economic system with its unitary focus on economic growth results in increased inequality, loss of jobs, alienation from both land and each other,<br />
The persistent exclusion of the dreams of the bottom billion people of our world, and<br />
Stressful and unhealthy lifestyles leading to physical and mental health problems;<br />
We are witnesses to massive expressions of aspiration and deep change as seen in the Arab Spring and the Occupy movements.<br />
We are aware and supportive of work being done in many global higher education and engagement spaces such as the Science in Society Programme of the European Commission.<br />
We are also aware that universities are complicit in the creation of our planetary problems but  we  also believe that knowing that communities and higher education institutions working together can play a significant role in the attainment of sustainable development.<br />
 We respectfully contribute our ideas to spaces for engagement and action on issues of planetary survival, including, but not limited to the<br />
United Nations Rio + 20 events<br />
Higher Education Treaty Circle process<br />
Horizon 2020 programme in Europe<br />
We call for action to:<br />
1. Challenge existing paradigms, structures and practices, by:<br />
a) Recognizing that knowledge and expertise exists outside of the institutions of higher education.  Communities and the earth itself are intellectual spaces where knowledge is created. Decolonizing our minds and our institutions is one step to acting on this awareness,<br />
b) Acknowledging that ‘community’ or ‘civic’ engagement, has to mean more than just people.  Community includes the environment or the rest of nature,<br />
c) Promoting the concept of an ‘Ecoversity’ whereby higher education institutions themselves are transformed into integrated holistic communities and where research, teaching and action functions are no longer separate<br />
d) Breaking down the silos of knowledge creation and moving to co-creation of knowledge in the university and community,<br />
e) Being open to ideas such as appointing community scholars, creating smaller universities, ‘walking on the grass’, and<br />
f) Working towards new disciplines for a new world.<br />
2. Increase the accountability of higher education by:<br />
a) Shifting accountability from authorities and funders to citizens, involving community at all levels of Higher Education governance,<br />
b) Linking our academic work with environmental social movements and to related movements against poverty, towards a solidarity economy,<br />
c) Ensuring that people have an understanding of the interdependencies between environmental, social and economic forces and the skills and abilities to meet sustainability challenges, and<br />
d) Moving beyond eco-branding by holding institutions accountable for the trademarks, brands and media around sustainability that they display.<br />
3. Understand the connections of our local practices within a global framework by:<br />
a) Acknowledging that in this inter-connected world, all ecological disturbances in one eco-zone spread rapidly throughout the world,<br />
b) Promoting new mechanisms of global governance and democratic accountability with multi-stakeholder perspectives, and<br />
c) Supporting the development of higher education theories and practices that nurture our global commons in the interest of a global public good.<br />
In closing<br />
We live in turbulent times; our world is changing at accelerating speed. Information is everywhere, but wisdom appears in short supply when trying to address key inter-related challenges of our time such as; runaway climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the depletion of natural resources, the on-going homogenization of culture, and rising inequity. Universities have a responsibility to look after the well-being of the planet, not as stand-alone beacons of knowledge, but as places where wisdom of communities, eco-systems and the academy in partnerships for a world that is more sustainable and just.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Andrea Vargiu</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Vargiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 15:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-417</guid>
		<description>First of all, a few words to the great group of people that wrote the draft document: thank you all: you've done a really excellent job!
I saw you mentionned skills and competences. How about mentionning shared knowledge (I'd like to decline that term in plural, but that is not possible, unless we force the english language a bit. Funny language, isn't it: other languages do contemplate the possibility of talking -and thinking- about a plurality of knowledges).
Even better, since some people's neurons make funny connections of the term "knowledge" with the word "economy" (i.e. they rapidly think of knowledge economy), how about introducing some expressions such as "wisdom" (like Arjen proposes), "collective intelligence" or something like that?
Thank you again for your wonderful document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, a few words to the great group of people that wrote the draft document: thank you all: you&#8217;ve done a really excellent job!<br />
I saw you mentionned skills and competences. How about mentionning shared knowledge (I&#8217;d like to decline that term in plural, but that is not possible, unless we force the english language a bit. Funny language, isn&#8217;t it: other languages do contemplate the possibility of talking -and thinking- about a plurality of knowledges).<br />
Even better, since some people&#8217;s neurons make funny connections of the term &#8220;knowledge&#8221; with the word &#8220;economy&#8221; (i.e. they rapidly think of knowledge economy), how about introducing some expressions such as &#8220;wisdom&#8221; (like Arjen proposes), &#8220;collective intelligence&#8221; or something like that?<br />
Thank you again for your wonderful document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Budd Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Budd Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 07:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Third Draft -two hours to go!


Third Draft

Communiqué on Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy* 
This statement is the product of a global dialogue and discussion process hosted by the Living Knowledge Network’s PERARES project.  It  is  an initiative of the ‘Big Tent’ Group of international networks which includes: Asia Pacific University Community Engagement Network, Centro Boliviano de Estudios Multidisciplinarios, Commonwealth Universities Extension and Engagement Network, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, Global Alliance on Community Engaged Research, Global University Network for Innovation, Living Knowledge Network, PASCAL International Observatory, Participatory Research in Asia, and the Talloires Network with additional contributions from on site and on line participants at the 5th International Conference of the Living Knowledge Network. 
We begin by expressing our deep concerns about:
The continued destruction of our common home, the planet Earth,
Our over dependence on technological solutions which can lead to ‘green washing’, 
Ways that the dominant global economic system with its unitary focus on economic growth results in increased inequality, loss of jobs, alienation from both land and each other,
The persistent exclusion of the dreams of the bottom billion people of our world, and
Stressful and unhealthy lifestyles leading to physical and mental health problems;
We are witnesses to massive expressions of aspiration and deep change as seen in the Arab Spring and the Occupy movements.
We are aware and supportive of work being done in many global higher education and engagement spaces such as the Science in Society Programme of the European Commission and, knowing that Community and Higher education collaboration is challenged to play a significant role in the attainment of sustainable development. 
 We respectfully contribute our ideas to spaces for engagement and action on issues of planetary survival, including, but not limited to the
United Nations Rio + 20 events
Higher Education Treaty Circle process
Horizon 2020 programme in Europe
We call for action to:
1. Challenge existing paradigms, structures and practices, by:
a) Recognizing that knowledge and expertise exists outside of the institutions of higher education.  Communities and the earth itself are intellectual spaces where knowledge is created. Decolonizing our minds and our institutions is one step to acting on this awareness,  
b) Acknowledging that ‘community’ or ‘civic’ engagement, has to mean more than just people.  Community includes the environment or the rest of nature,  
c) Promoting the concept of an ‘Ecoversity’ whereby higher education institutions themselves are transformed into integrated holistic communities and where research, teaching and action functions are no longer separate   
d) Breaking down the silos of knowledge creation and moving to co-creation of knowledge in the university and community,  
e) Being open to ideas such as appointing community scholars, creating smaller universities, ‘walking on the grass’, and
f) Working towards new disciplines for a new world.
2. Increase the accountability of higher education by:
a) Shifting accountability from authorities and funders to citizens, involving community at all levels of Higher Education governance,
b) Linking our academic work with environmental social movements and to related movements against poverty, towards a solidarity economy, 
c) Ensuring that people have an understanding of the interdependencies between environmental, social and economic forces and the skills and abilities to meet sustainability challenges, and
d) Moving beyond eco-branding by holding institutions accountable for the trademarks, brands and media around sustainability that they display.  
3. Understand the connections of our local practices within a global framework by:
a) Acknowledging that in this inter-connected world, all ecological disturbances in one eco-zone spread rapidly throughout the world,
b) Promoting new mechanisms of global governance and democratic accountability with multi-stakeholder perspectives, and
c) Supporting the development of higher education theories and practices that nurture our global commons in the interest of a global public good.
In closing
We live in turbulent times, our world is changing at accelerating speed. Information is everywhere, but wisdom appears in short supply when trying to address key inter-related challenges of our time such as; runaway climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the depletion of natural resources, the on-going homogenization of culture, and rising inequity. Universities have a responsibility to look after the well-being of the planet, not as stand-alone beacons of knowledge, but as places where wisdom of communities, eco-systems and the academy in partnerships for a world that is more sustainable and just.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Third Draft -two hours to go!</p>
<p>Third Draft</p>
<p>Communiqué on Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy*<br />
This statement is the product of a global dialogue and discussion process hosted by the Living Knowledge Network’s PERARES project.  It  is  an initiative of the ‘Big Tent’ Group of international networks which includes: Asia Pacific University Community Engagement Network, Centro Boliviano de Estudios Multidisciplinarios, Commonwealth Universities Extension and Engagement Network, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, Global Alliance on Community Engaged Research, Global University Network for Innovation, Living Knowledge Network, PASCAL International Observatory, Participatory Research in Asia, and the Talloires Network with additional contributions from on site and on line participants at the 5th International Conference of the Living Knowledge Network.<br />
We begin by expressing our deep concerns about:<br />
The continued destruction of our common home, the planet Earth,<br />
Our over dependence on technological solutions which can lead to ‘green washing’,<br />
Ways that the dominant global economic system with its unitary focus on economic growth results in increased inequality, loss of jobs, alienation from both land and each other,<br />
The persistent exclusion of the dreams of the bottom billion people of our world, and<br />
Stressful and unhealthy lifestyles leading to physical and mental health problems;<br />
We are witnesses to massive expressions of aspiration and deep change as seen in the Arab Spring and the Occupy movements.<br />
We are aware and supportive of work being done in many global higher education and engagement spaces such as the Science in Society Programme of the European Commission and, knowing that Community and Higher education collaboration is challenged to play a significant role in the attainment of sustainable development.<br />
 We respectfully contribute our ideas to spaces for engagement and action on issues of planetary survival, including, but not limited to the<br />
United Nations Rio + 20 events<br />
Higher Education Treaty Circle process<br />
Horizon 2020 programme in Europe<br />
We call for action to:<br />
1. Challenge existing paradigms, structures and practices, by:<br />
a) Recognizing that knowledge and expertise exists outside of the institutions of higher education.  Communities and the earth itself are intellectual spaces where knowledge is created. Decolonizing our minds and our institutions is one step to acting on this awareness,<br />
b) Acknowledging that ‘community’ or ‘civic’ engagement, has to mean more than just people.  Community includes the environment or the rest of nature,<br />
c) Promoting the concept of an ‘Ecoversity’ whereby higher education institutions themselves are transformed into integrated holistic communities and where research, teaching and action functions are no longer separate<br />
d) Breaking down the silos of knowledge creation and moving to co-creation of knowledge in the university and community,<br />
e) Being open to ideas such as appointing community scholars, creating smaller universities, ‘walking on the grass’, and<br />
f) Working towards new disciplines for a new world.<br />
2. Increase the accountability of higher education by:<br />
a) Shifting accountability from authorities and funders to citizens, involving community at all levels of Higher Education governance,<br />
b) Linking our academic work with environmental social movements and to related movements against poverty, towards a solidarity economy,<br />
c) Ensuring that people have an understanding of the interdependencies between environmental, social and economic forces and the skills and abilities to meet sustainability challenges, and<br />
d) Moving beyond eco-branding by holding institutions accountable for the trademarks, brands and media around sustainability that they display.<br />
3. Understand the connections of our local practices within a global framework by:<br />
a) Acknowledging that in this inter-connected world, all ecological disturbances in one eco-zone spread rapidly throughout the world,<br />
b) Promoting new mechanisms of global governance and democratic accountability with multi-stakeholder perspectives, and<br />
c) Supporting the development of higher education theories and practices that nurture our global commons in the interest of a global public good.<br />
In closing<br />
We live in turbulent times, our world is changing at accelerating speed. Information is everywhere, but wisdom appears in short supply when trying to address key inter-related challenges of our time such as; runaway climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the depletion of natural resources, the on-going homogenization of culture, and rising inequity. Universities have a responsibility to look after the well-being of the planet, not as stand-alone beacons of knowledge, but as places where wisdom of communities, eco-systems and the academy in partnerships for a world that is more sustainable and just.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Budd Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Budd Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 07:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Thanks EVERYONE for the great additions.  We are attempting to incorporate the spirit of your
contributions in our draft that will be read out in two hours to the conference.

We will keep the draft open for a week, as we need to give the formal networks an opportunity
to have more time to contribute.

We will be sending this with Daniella Tilbury and Arjen Wals to Rio + 20 and the Higher Education Treaty Circle and via Henk Mulder and Norbert Steinhaus to the Science in Society programme in the European Commission.

Once finished, it will "belong" to anyone who wishes to use it.

Cheers,

Budd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks EVERYONE for the great additions.  We are attempting to incorporate the spirit of your<br />
contributions in our draft that will be read out in two hours to the conference.</p>
<p>We will keep the draft open for a week, as we need to give the formal networks an opportunity<br />
to have more time to contribute.</p>
<p>We will be sending this with Daniella Tilbury and Arjen Wals to Rio + 20 and the Higher Education Treaty Circle and via Henk Mulder and Norbert Steinhaus to the Science in Society programme in the European Commission.</p>
<p>Once finished, it will &#8220;belong&#8221; to anyone who wishes to use it.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Budd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Beth savan</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth savan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 05:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone: I want to add the issue of engagement with the on campus community to that of the off campus community. Universities are traditionally divided into teaching and research units and, very separately, operational units. The more that these two solitudes can be linked through using campuses as living labs, the more that universities can include students in the examination and assessment of campus sustainability efforts, as well as the enhancement of these efforts through student and staff as well as faculty participation. This is a form of on campus community based research that is essential to the realization of university sustainability efforts. Collaboration with the off campus community is also important, but we should first, or simultaneously, encourage collaboration among the on campus sectors who most often work in relative isolation from each other. Our sustainability office website at the university of toronto includes a number of pertinent examples of projects linking students, faculty and staff in collaborative efforts to reduce resource consumption on campus. 
Beth Savan, Ph.D. MCIP, Sustainability Director, University of Toronto
Sr. Fellow, Massey College; Sr. Lecturer, Centre for Environment
http://sustainability.utoronto.ca/about/people/director.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone: I want to add the issue of engagement with the on campus community to that of the off campus community. Universities are traditionally divided into teaching and research units and, very separately, operational units. The more that these two solitudes can be linked through using campuses as living labs, the more that universities can include students in the examination and assessment of campus sustainability efforts, as well as the enhancement of these efforts through student and staff as well as faculty participation. This is a form of on campus community based research that is essential to the realization of university sustainability efforts. Collaboration with the off campus community is also important, but we should first, or simultaneously, encourage collaboration among the on campus sectors who most often work in relative isolation from each other. Our sustainability office website at the university of toronto includes a number of pertinent examples of projects linking students, faculty and staff in collaborative efforts to reduce resource consumption on campus.<br />
Beth Savan, Ph.D. MCIP, Sustainability Director, University of Toronto<br />
Sr. Fellow, Massey College; Sr. Lecturer, Centre for Environment<br />
<a href="http://sustainability.utoronto.ca/about/people/director.htm" rel="nofollow">http://sustainability.utoronto.ca/about/people/director.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Prof Steve Garlick</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof Steve Garlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 05:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-413</guid>
		<description>You have covered much of the ground in your draft Budd. Well done. I just have one lingering concern when we discuss the role of learning, innovation, research and the other activities of higher education institutions in the context of engaging with community others to contribute to better planetary outcomes. There does need to be an ethical and moral framework in which this all takes place to ensure this engaged learning and enhanced awareness honestly contributes to better outcomes for all (human and non-human) on the planet and will not just benefit a few humans because of requirements of funding agencies or the demands of various power elite.  Justified discontent with human exceptionalism in finding solutions to environmental problems, when most of the problems with the planet have been created by the same educated people, makes this a difficult one to overcome. In a sense you have to become as one with the needs of the planet before you can rightly contribute. You need to be able to communicate with the environment. In that regard I am attracted to using Zygmund Bauman's (1995) 'being-for' form of engagement because it puts you in this realm of engagement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have covered much of the ground in your draft Budd. Well done. I just have one lingering concern when we discuss the role of learning, innovation, research and the other activities of higher education institutions in the context of engaging with community others to contribute to better planetary outcomes. There does need to be an ethical and moral framework in which this all takes place to ensure this engaged learning and enhanced awareness honestly contributes to better outcomes for all (human and non-human) on the planet and will not just benefit a few humans because of requirements of funding agencies or the demands of various power elite.  Justified discontent with human exceptionalism in finding solutions to environmental problems, when most of the problems with the planet have been created by the same educated people, makes this a difficult one to overcome. In a sense you have to become as one with the needs of the planet before you can rightly contribute. You need to be able to communicate with the environment. In that regard I am attracted to using Zygmund Bauman&#8217;s (1995) &#8216;being-for&#8217; form of engagement because it puts you in this realm of engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Leslie Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 03:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Given the comments above and my own perspectives, I think we should cautious about claiming that higher educational institutions have a "unique leadership tole to play" - let's fact it, the higher education sector is lagging behind in the movements toward sustainability and democracy.  Universities must catch up to the Keadership displayed by corporate, government, community and philanthropic sectors.  On campuses, students are often the most progressive actors and we need to tap into them more as agents of change.  I also would like to see us coalesce around a clear and compelling vision that many can rally around without a lot of jargon - for example, carbon neutral campuses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the comments above and my own perspectives, I think we should cautious about claiming that higher educational institutions have a &#8220;unique leadership tole to play&#8221; - let&#8217;s fact it, the higher education sector is lagging behind in the movements toward sustainability and democracy.  Universities must catch up to the Keadership displayed by corporate, government, community and philanthropic sectors.  On campuses, students are often the most progressive actors and we need to tap into them more as agents of change.  I also would like to see us coalesce around a clear and compelling vision that many can rally around without a lot of jargon - for example, carbon neutral campuses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Arjen Wals</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjen Wals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-411</guid>
		<description>We live in turbulent times, our world is changing at accelerating speed. Information is everywhere, but wisdom appears in short supply when trying to address key inter-related challenges of our time such as; runaway climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the depletion of natural resources, the on-going homogenization of culture, and rising inequity. Living in such times has implications for education and learning.  Universities have a responsibility in engaging some of the brightest people we in these key challenges. As still mostly public institutions they need to look after the well-being of the planet, not as stand-alone beacons of knowledge, but as places of wisdom anchored in communities and eco-systems. Science for impact and societal relevance with a planetary conscience. Doing so will not only restore trust in science but also lead to creative partnerships between universities, CSOs, communities, NGOs and the private sector that will utlimately lead to a world that is more sustainable than the one currently in prosepect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in turbulent times, our world is changing at accelerating speed. Information is everywhere, but wisdom appears in short supply when trying to address key inter-related challenges of our time such as; runaway climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the depletion of natural resources, the on-going homogenization of culture, and rising inequity. Living in such times has implications for education and learning.  Universities have a responsibility in engaging some of the brightest people we in these key challenges. As still mostly public institutions they need to look after the well-being of the planet, not as stand-alone beacons of knowledge, but as places of wisdom anchored in communities and eco-systems. Science for impact and societal relevance with a planetary conscience. Doing so will not only restore trust in science but also lead to creative partnerships between universities, CSOs, communities, NGOs and the private sector that will utlimately lead to a world that is more sustainable than the one currently in prosepect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Juliet Millican</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliet Millican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 15:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-410</guid>
		<description>Underlying a lot of these comments, and voiced clearly in the contribution from Nicky Okeyo is the need for knowledge exchange - an acknowledgement of the importance of different perspectives in gaining a holistic understanding of an issue or a problem. As an approach this is one that universities can begin to offer through undergraduate teaching and weave into discussions about what constitutes a ‘scholarly approach’. 
Our current dominant paradigm privileges some ‘credible sources of information’, suggesting hierarchies of knowledge and as a result invariable ignores half of the picture. As we know (and is vividly illustrated in Ranjesh's quote) community based knowledge is not necessarily 'right' either, but generally contains an important perspective and one which, if we are to understand how the world works, we need to take account of. 
Wenger's 'Communities of Practice approach' brings together practitioners from different areas and disciplines that share a passion for something and, through dialogue and the sharing of practice, grapple towards a fuller, mutual understanding of something they all care about. It is this sharing of practice (this is what I do and this is how I come to know what I know) that serves not only to build a more holistic understanding within the group but illustrates how every sort of knowledge is, in its own way,  limited.
We have worked with some of these approaches in Cupp, a community university partnership based at the University of Brighton through supporting research partnerships that bring together academics and practitioners. Other universities are developing similar innovative approaches but in the main academic culture still privileges what is seen as rigorous academic research over and above community based research. By encouraging our own students to interrogate knowledge, to compare different forms of knowing and understanding and to build links across and outside the academy we can begin to nudge academic culture in new directions. And perhaps our students won’t make the same mistakes as the young Rajesh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Underlying a lot of these comments, and voiced clearly in the contribution from Nicky Okeyo is the need for knowledge exchange - an acknowledgement of the importance of different perspectives in gaining a holistic understanding of an issue or a problem. As an approach this is one that universities can begin to offer through undergraduate teaching and weave into discussions about what constitutes a ‘scholarly approach’.<br />
Our current dominant paradigm privileges some ‘credible sources of information’, suggesting hierarchies of knowledge and as a result invariable ignores half of the picture. As we know (and is vividly illustrated in Ranjesh&#8217;s quote) community based knowledge is not necessarily &#8216;right&#8217; either, but generally contains an important perspective and one which, if we are to understand how the world works, we need to take account of.<br />
Wenger&#8217;s &#8216;Communities of Practice approach&#8217; brings together practitioners from different areas and disciplines that share a passion for something and, through dialogue and the sharing of practice, grapple towards a fuller, mutual understanding of something they all care about. It is this sharing of practice (this is what I do and this is how I come to know what I know) that serves not only to build a more holistic understanding within the group but illustrates how every sort of knowledge is, in its own way,  limited.<br />
We have worked with some of these approaches in Cupp, a community university partnership based at the University of Brighton through supporting research partnerships that bring together academics and practitioners. Other universities are developing similar innovative approaches but in the main academic culture still privileges what is seen as rigorous academic research over and above community based research. By encouraging our own students to interrogate knowledge, to compare different forms of knowing and understanding and to build links across and outside the academy we can begin to nudge academic culture in new directions. And perhaps our students won’t make the same mistakes as the young Rajesh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Tent III: Sustainability, Knowledge and Democracy by Edward S. Lowry</title>
		<link>http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/2012/big-tent-iii-how-to-enhance-community-university-collaboration-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward S. Lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 15:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingknowledge.org/discussion/diskutiere/?p=42412#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Students everywhere are taught how to arrange pieces of information by teachers who are 
unaware of the possibility of pieces of information that are well designed to be easily arranged.
This makes technical knowledge too complex and it makes technicasl education too
expensive and resource intensive. If we thoroughly eliminate various kinds of inexcusable complexity
that result from poor language and data structures it leads to convergence of design for
representation and convergence of language. That can make technical education and communication
simoler,  more accessible, and less costly. See http://users.rcn.com/eslowry .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Students everywhere are taught how to arrange pieces of information by teachers who are<br />
unaware of the possibility of pieces of information that are well designed to be easily arranged.<br />
This makes technical knowledge too complex and it makes technicasl education too<br />
expensive and resource intensive. If we thoroughly eliminate various kinds of inexcusable complexity<br />
that result from poor language and data structures it leads to convergence of design for<br />
representation and convergence of language. That can make technical education and communication<br />
simoler,  more accessible, and less costly. See <a href="http://users.rcn.com/eslowry" rel="nofollow">http://users.rcn.com/eslowry</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

